Dr. Michael W. Fox

Home | Vegetarianism: A Bioethical Imperative | Dr. Fox on the Tonight Show | In Memoriam_Feral Cat Mark Twain | DVD Links | Releasing Cats To Live Outdoors | Outdoor Cats, Wildlife And Human Health | Cat and Dog Nutrition--the Thiamine Issue | Cat Food Recipe | Cat Tail Deemed To Be Good Vaccination Spot | Cat Behavior | Cat Vaccination Protocols | Declawing Cats | Feline Stomatitis Complex | Cat Litter Box Issues | Introducing A New Cat | Introducing A Dog Into Cat's Home | Choosing To Live With A Dog | Dog Vaccination Protocols | Dog Mutilations | Dog Food Recipe | Dental Problems In Companion Animals | Dog Food and Feeding Issues | Dr. Fox's Good Medicine Juice | The Truth About Manfactured Dog and Cat Food | Companion Animals Harmed By Pesticides | Dominance-based Dog Training | Dr. Fox and the Super Dog Project | Guide to Congenital & Heritable Disorders in Dogs | Dogwise E-Books | Concerning Outdoor Chaining/Tethering Of Dogs | Dogs In Shelters | Dr. Fox's Good Dog Cookie Recipe | Don't Clone Your Dog Or Cat! | The Pros and Cons of Neutering Your Dog | Recovering Canine Health And The Natural Dog | Animal Vaccination Concerns | Care For Dogs and Cats With Renal Failure | Urinary Tract Stones | Green Pet Care | Puppy and Kitten Breeding Mills | Pure Water for Cats and Dogs--and All | Dental Problems In Companion Animals | Chemical-related Human Diseases In Companion Animals | From Mineral Oil & Multiple Sclerosis to Plastics, Nanoparticles | Companion Animal Care | Companion Animals and Flea and Tick Treatments | Behavioral Problems and Drug Solutions: A Last Resort | Preventing Fleas | Domestication and Diet | Lyme Disease and Wildlife Management | Disease and Animal Rights | GMOs and Pet Food | Journal of AVMA and GMOs | Indoor and Outdoor Poison Hazards for Pets | Carrageenan In Pet Foods | Cats, Dogs and Cadmium | Fluoride In Pet Food - A Serious Health Risk? | Best Manufactured Pet Foods | Pet Food Letters | Nutrigenomics and the Pet Food Revolution | The Ethics of Krill Oil and Protein Supplements | Animal-Insensitivity Syndrome | Wolves and Human Well-being | Wolf-Dog Hybrids | Crying Wolf Too Much | Betrayal of Wolves and Public Trust | The 'One Medicine' | Pet Health Insurance | The Veterinary Profession |   Pharmaceutical Cruelty In Animal Farms: Consumer Beware | Pig Parts For People | Conflicts Of Interest In The Veterinary Profession | Bioethics: Its Scope And Purpose | The Bioethics And Politics Of Manufactured Pet Foods | Animal Rights, Human Rights And Wrongs | The Future of the Veterinary Profession | Holistic Veterinary Medicine | Veterinary Ethics and Economics | Veterinary Bioethics and Animal Welfare | Principles Of Veterinary Bioethics | What Price Our Animal Relationships? | Changing Diets for Health's and Earth's Sake | Wildlife Conservation | Wildlife Reseach Needs Ethical Boundaries | Wildlife Management Practices | How Animals Suffer Around the World | Feeling for Animals and Animal Liberation | Animal Altruism and Abilty To Empathize | What Makes Animals Happy? | The Empathosphere: Animal Prescience, And Remote Sensing | Mental Effects on Physical Health: The Mind-Body Connection | Animal Spirits | Light Of Compassion | Religion, Science and Animal Rights | Animal Suffering And The God Question | Healing Animals & The Vision of One Health | Islam And Animals | Panentheism: The Spirituality Of Compassion | One Earth, One Health | Why We All Must Care For Animals and the Environment | Quality Of Life In Animals | Healing Agriculture's Broken Connections | Mammon Vs. Civil Society | Agriculture | Justice For All Beings And The End Of Terrorism | Universal Bill Of Rights For Animals And Nature | Science Writers' and Reporters' Political Agendas | Cambridge Declaration On Consciousness | Michael W. Fox Resume' | Dr. Fox Biographical Interview | Interview: History of Animal Welfare Science | Curriculum Vitae | Books By Dr. Fox | Dr. Fox Lectures, Seminars and Workshops | My Life For The Animals | To Kiss Salamanders and Stones

Wildlife Conservation



By Dr. Michael W. Fox


 International efforts to improve human health and wellbeing are now recognizing that such efforts will not succeed if the quality of the human environment is ignored. Improving environmental quality is an integral component of 'planetary CPR' ---environmental conservation, preservation, and restoration.

 The importance of improving the health and welfare of domestic animals as an integral component of both 'planetary CPR' and improving human health and wellbeing, is now also gaining recognition. For too long, animal welfare and protection have taken a low priority on the philanthropic, international aid, development and humanitarian agenda. This overview of the essential connections between people, animals and nature presents the case for a more integrative approach to wildlife conservation, human wellbeing, and domestic animal protection and health.


Revisioning Health
 The old definition of health as the absence of disease has been broadened by the World Health Organization to include social, economic and environmental considerations. This broader definition may be adequate for urban people, especially those of the industrial West. But for the majority of the world’s rural communities and indigenous (tribal) peoples, it is insufficient. It is inadequate for the formulation of appropriate policies and implementation of effective aid and development programs, because the health and welfare of the domestic animals living with these people and the protection of wildlife, conservation and restoration of natural habitat ('biodiversity' and 'ecosystems') are integral to human wellbeing, on many levels. These include public health, family nutrition, economic security, community sustainability, cultural identity, traditional and spiritual values. Biodiversity and cultural diversity are interlinked, codependent and co-evolved in all ecosystems that include the human species.


Global Biosphere Reserves
 The brilliance of the United Nations Man and the Biosphere initiative, which has now identified over 400 Global Biosphere Reserves around the world, is in the  recognition of this vital linkage between culture and Nature, and between the integrity of cultural and biological diversity.  Such integrity does not imply a preservationist paradigm that seeks to freeze the human and wild and domestic animal and plant co-communities in some kind of static limbo in time and space. Such would be virtual realities, akin to theme parks, requiring constant and costly external correctives.
 The Biosphere II project, the experimental, hi-tech but closed human, plant and animal biotic community in the Arizona desert, failed to be a self-regenerative biosystem because of unforeseen consequences that led to a decreasing supply of oxygen. A sustainable, low-input, regenerative biosphere system is one that is open, fluid, and biodynamic, rather than closed, controlled, and 'biostatic.'


Sustainable Biosystems
 Sustainable human biosystems are the antithesis of the agricultural, agriforestry and aquatic monocultures of the industrial age. Self-sustaining systems incorporate and enhance biodiversity through locally and bioregionally appropriate polycultures of various domestic plants and animals (i.e. mixed farming, forestry and aquaculture systems); and through the sustainable management and exploitation of natural resources, including wild animals from bees to buffalo, who are treated humanely because they are respected as integral to the wellbeing of both the human community and the entire biotic community.

 The factors that are endangering both indigenous peoples and wildlife---i.e. biocultural diversity-in many of these UN-designated Global Biosphere Reserves often have a synergistic effect, as I discovered and documented in one of these Reserves in S. India. The Honey Kurumba tribals in this Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve in Tamil Nadu traditionally adopt sustainable use and management practices of forest resources, including the wax and honey of wild bees, that are now endangered, along with the Kurumbas and other tribal peoples. The Toda tribal pastoralists in this same Reserve, for example, face illegal land encroachment of the traditional grazing lands and the near extinction of their unique Toda white buffalo that are integral to their cultural identity and religion, from a lack of adequate veterinary services. (See Addendum.)

 I worked with my wife Deanna Krantz in India for several years where her project advocated and activated several integrated programs based on an expanded World health Organization (WHO-UN) vision of health and human wellbeing. This expanded vision linked the health and wellbeing of domestic animals, upon whom the indigenous peoples are dependent, economically, culturally, and spiritually, with the health and conservation of wildlife.


 The protection of wildlife, and conservation and restoration of natural habitat, are linked with the traditional and innovative sustainable farming methods and other community-based, environmentally friendly activities, including social forestry and soil and water conservation practices of indigenous peoples.


The Animal Component
 This holistic, integrated paradigm means that  Healthcare = Peoplecare + Animalcare + Earthcare.  A healthy domestic animal population -- achieved through free community veterinary services, humane education, training in animal husbandry, and enforcement of animal anti-cruelty laws--means improved income for livestock keepers; and control of zoonotic diseases (like rabies and foot and mouth disease) that unhealthy domestic animal populations harbor and variously spread to people and wildlife.

 We put into practice a working model project whose replication in other Global Biosphere Reserves would do much to ensure the continued protection and restoration of biocultural diversity because of its grass-roots, rather than top-down, approach of working with the people for the people. Animal welfare is to human welfare, as nature conservation and biodiversity are to human culture and diversity. Hence, the value of an interdisciplinary approach where improvement in the human condition is linked with improving environmental quality, wildlife and habitat conservation, preservation, and restoration, and with domestic animal health, productivity, and welfare through improved veterinary care and humane husbandry education.

 More recent, post-colonial efforts to protect wildlife and habitat have involved indigenous peoples in such roles as working as wildlife eco-safari trackers, conservation monitors, and anti-poaching teams; in reducing the adverse impacts of their domestic animals through improved grazing, land management practices, and animal health and productivity; and by adopting economically viable, sustainable agricultural practices and cooperative, socially just marketing networks.
 Similar kinds of illegal and legal activities, from poaching and diverting streams to grazing too many animals and poisoning and snaring predators, as we documented in the Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve (see Addendum) are likely to be encountered in other Global Biosphere Reserves. Hence, the need for close collaboration with reliable local NGOs, government officials, village leaders and tribal elders who understand the need for reform, collaborative oversight and effective management, coupled with appropriate animal protection and conservation law enactment and consistent enforcement, and the implementation of economically viable, environmentally friendly, and socially just ways to meet the needs of the people.

International organizations like Wildlife Conservation International, and Heifer Project International are adopting the bottom-up rather than top-down approach, working with local NGOs and government authorities at the grass roots, putting compassion into action, and facilitating mutually enhancing symbioses between people, animals, and Nature.
The critical state of the world’s ecosystems and precarious future of most indigenous communities present a global triage situation for those governmental and nongovernmental organizations dedicated to human aid and development, and saving the last of the wild.  The UN Global Biosphere Reserve initiative identifies those places and peoples that, given the finite nature of financial and other external inputs and resources, have the best chance of being conserved, protected, and restored.



There are several documented, and many word-of mouth accounts of chemically immobilized and otherwise restrained endangered species like the Asian elephant and African wild dog being severely injured, killed or dying soon after capture and/or release. In some instances there was an association with the animals being injected with un-tested and un-approved modified live virus vaccines. In other instances the injured or killed animal was a pregnant or nursing mother.


 Experienced veterinary supervision is called for especially when research biologists are loose in the field using drugs and vaccines on their animal subjects and applying various methods of capture and restraint which may cause serious injury, capture myopathy and even death.


Wildlife continue to be harassed, stressed, and subjected to these in-field risks so that tissue and blood samples can be taken (though DNA evidence can be obtained from feces and rubbing/marking areas), radio collars and even cameras fitted,  and microchips implanted. The generation of more scientific data from such field research may help advance careers and engender more funding, and give some substance to wildlife management schemes. But when the animals in question are put at risk, and there are no in-place regulations and effective law enforcement to protect and restore their existing habitats, and to extend same in order to help minimize accelerating loss of genetic biodiversity, then these wildlife researchers should cease and desist.


 Such activities alone have nothing to do with wildlife conservation and at best give the false impression that something is being done, the foreign presence alone being a deterrent to poaching etc etc. Yet in reality from a bioethical perspective, the risks to the animals far exceed the immediate and foreseeable benefits. So I appeal to all appropriate institutions and organizations, governmental and non-governmental, for-profit and not-for profit, to encourage alternative, non-invasive wildlife research, and to cease funding and permitting any form of wildlife capture except for well justified emergency veterinary and conservation-translocation reasons.



Check the link below for a Dr. Fox C-Span feature concerning "Animal Testing"

Dr. Michael W. Fox on C-Span

--Video Link--

Dr. Michael W. Fox

What right do we humans have to exploit other animals?  Where does that right come from and what are the limits if any?  What duties or obligations do we have in our relationships with our dogs, cats and other animals domesticated and wild?

          Follow and support Caroline Kraus and her Moments of Truth Project documentary film as she travels across the U.S. asking people, who variously live, work with and care for animals, these and other relevant questions.

Is there an overriding consensus and what are the reasons why people respond very differently to these questions, which in part examine our character, culture and future?

The viewing and discussion of this kind of documentary should be part of every school curriculum and will be of interest to all who work with, profit from and care for animals. Project Home Page: http://momentsoftruthproject.com/  To see the interview with Dr. Fox go to http://momentsoftruthproject.com/dr-michael-fox/