Panentheism:
The Sprituality of Compassion and Equalitarianism
By Dr. Michael W. Fox
The origins of my own spirituality and ethics and awakening of feral vision are seeded in a childhood
that was, thanks to my parents, linked closely with animals and Nature. A sense
of wonder and awe, as well as respect and compassion, was imbued at an early age. I
also had several experiences that laid the foundation for an attitude of kinship and an awareness of the sacred unity, interdependence
and mutuality of origin of all life. This foundation was tested, and to some
degree enriched, by graduate training in veterinary medicine and postgraduate research in animal psychology, ethology and
ecology. And it was later challenged when I left academia to confront the institutionalized
(and socially and religiously sanctioned and unquestioned) exploitation of animals, especially by the biomedical research
establishment, agribusiness, and the commercial hunting, trapping and pet industries.
Yet ironically, when I joined The Humane Society of the United States (The HSUS) in 1976, there were complaints by
some members that The HSUS had "sold out" by hiring a scientist and veterinarian, and therefore a person who is on the side
of those who exploit animals!
I am not such an idealist as to believe that we should not exploit life in order to sustain our
own. That we must do, and if that be the tragedy of reality, then so be it. But I cannot accept the wholesale and unquestioned exploitation of animals purely
for reasons of profit, knowledge, emotional or gustatory gratification, especially when there is no reciprocal benefit to
them. I find no religious basis for the chauvinistic belief that animals were
created for our own use. There is no scientific basis for the contention that
they lack any of those qualities associated with sentience and sapience that our own species possesses to varying degrees. Nor is there any rational basis for the belief that only humans possess immortal souls
and that we are the only species on Earth created in God's image.
It is a matter of historical record that the saints,
sages and avatars of the world's major religions have always emphasized our kinship with animals and with the whole of Creation:
and that an attitude of humility, compassion and respect and reverence for all life is the key to a just, humane and sustainable
society. This attitude does not preclude us form exploiting non-human life in
order to sustain our own. Rather, it sets limits and raises questions because
non-human life is as much a part of our moral and spiritual community of concern and responsibility as it is an integral part
of the ecological community of planet Earth.
My own convictions and perceptions lead me to embrace the Creation-centered spirituality and
ethics of panentheism, as distinct from primitive, superstitious pantheism and anthropocentric (and andromorphic) monotheism. I see in panentheism the antidotes to the harmful consequences that arise when materialism
and industrialism are embedded either in a monotheistic, patriarchal and anthropocentric worldview, or in a purely atheistic,
humanistic one.
I do not see panentheism as a cultish product of New Age thinking. In actuality, it is the seed-concept within the monotheistic heart of Judaic, Islamic, and Christian mysticism,
as well as in the polytheistic spirit of Hinduism. When there is feral vision,
there is such clarity of perception that the Christian sees the mystical "Christ-in-all," and the Tibetan Buddhist sees that
"everything is Buddha."
Panentheism originated, I believe, thousands of years before the advent of contemporary, anthropocentric,
monotheistic religious traditions, when the human species was part of Nature as a gatherer and hunter. Anthropologists remind us that over ninety percent of our time on Earth as Homo sapiens we lived
as gatherer-hunters. Agriculture-based civilization is only 6,000 - 8,000 years
old, and industrial society a mere fraction of that.
And so, in spite of the rapid change in how we now live and relate to the natural world, a panentheistic
worldview lies deep in the marrow of our psyches, in our collective memory, psychohistory, and in our instinctive longing
of and for that time when we danced with wolves and sang to the stars. Panentheism
was the primal key, not back to Eden or to Paradise, but to living in communion. Though
panentheistic sensibility, our ancestors conceived a Covenant between Creator and Creation that humankind is enjoined, spiritually
and ethically, to uphold.
The Christian hermetic desert fathers tried to preserve this Covenant of consciousness and conscience. They, like St. Francis of Assisi, saw the emerging age of commerce and industrialism
as defiling and consuming the natural world. They did not accept the new world
order of the Church of Rome that placed God above all (for God is also in all); and that placed humans above animals
and Nature, and men above women.
Panentheism is the essence of what I call the Old Religion of pre-industrial gatherer and hunter
and sustainable agrarian societies. The Hopi Indians and Australian aboriginals
share the panentheistic view that God is in all.
They still embrace the Old Religion, that once universal spirituality that was assimilated into Christianity, Judaism
and Islam. (It is ironic and telling that these religious factions are still
in conflict in the Middle East, that was once Eden, the mythic, verdant Paradise of ancestral memory, but is now a ravaged
desert wasteland.)
Panentheism is as old as what is left of our humanity.
The panentheistic dimension of Christianity, exemplified by the statement of St. Paul: "I live, yet not I, but Christ
liveth in me," is the Parousia of panentheistic empathy (panempathy) and self-realization. The perception of an omnipresent and co-inherent, as well as transcendent, Creator gives rise to a worldview
that is both God and Creation-centered. This feral, planentheistic perception
is clearly described in Colossians (1:16-18): "In Him all things were created...all things were created through Him...and
in Him all things hold together." Many traditional peoples still practice various
rituals of initiation that enable young adults to experience states of panentheistic perception and panempathic feeling as
described by participants in vision quests and sweat-lodge ceremonies. The enter and have communion in what I call the empathosphere.
It is regrettable that the main initiations into adulthood for young adult members of contemporary consumer society are credit
cards, shopping malls, car keys and a driver's license; and in rural areas, guns for pubescent boys to kill wild creatures.
If we are not here to serve Creation, "to dress and to keep" the garden of Eden, then what are
we here for? Surely not simply to procreate and desecrate. Human life has depth of purpose and significance when it is directed
to this end: to serve the greater good and follow the Golden Rule. But when our
lives are not so directed, at least in part, then we continue to suffer in body and spirit as a consequence. We all have the opportunity to serve, to give to life more than we take, and to heal more than we harm.
Perfection (of either person or planet) is not the goal of compassion. Compassion is a verb, a call to action, and as history informs, it is one of the most sublime of all our
callings. Benevolence to all sentient life necessitates an attitude of humility
and thanksgiving toward Creation, and was a virtue embraced and promoted by the Old Religion.
But in contemporary industrial society, regardless of its theisms and morality, such virtue is as rare as the scent
of wild sage across an atomic desert, and as remote and abstract as renunciation and reverence.